Week 5
Problem 1: Was the WHO right to say “test, test, test” ?
We must remember that these are still early days, and the final picture of the pandemic will not be known for some time. When everything has stabilized, and we all know how things were when it was actually over, everything will be much clearer. Both South Korea & Germany started their preliminary program before they had to. In each country when a positive result for Covid-19 was obtained, detailed contact tracing was carried out, and all secondary cases were put into quarantine.
South Korea never had to introduce full lockdown, but did introduce some partial measures. The outbreak number of cases stands at 8,652 cases and 94 deaths as of March 19, now has a case rate in relative decline. During the worst periods of February, Korean officials had been recording more than 900 a day. By March 19, the country has conducted more than 307,000 tests, the highest per capita in the world. . The Wall Street Journal reports that the country can test more than 20,000 people a day at 633 testing sites nationwide. A smartphone app provides GPS maps to track the infection’s spread. Medics pitch massive white tents on roadsides, where citizens receive free drive through testing, reducing the need to clean infected hazmat suits. Results are swift, too, coming by text within 24 hours.
Germany has the highest rate of testing in the world, rising to 1,500/M population at risk by April 15, 2020. The high rate of testing is part of a containment strategy, linked to contact tracing with quarantine of all secondary cases detected. They also have a much younger population at risk – only 10% >60 (cf 50% in spain)..They also have far more high intensity beds (the number of acute-care beds in Germany is 621 per 100,000 people, compared with Italy’s 275 beds per 100,000 and the UK’s 228 beds per 100,000
Spain will be used as an example of a European countries, whose governments did little to mitigate what was to come. We could just as well have used France, Italy or (of course) the UK.
South Korea Germany Spain
Time to double prevalence 22 days 8 days 12 days
Total deaths (April 8) 217 2,799 16,800
Daily new deaths 3 186 619
Area of country 100/km2 357/km2 505/km2
Size of population 51,3M 88M 468M
Density of population/km2 517/km2 233/km2 93/km2
GINI Index 31.3 31.9 34.9
Date of lockdown Only partial March 19 March 14
Tests/M pre-lockdown 205.4 1,453 hospital use only
Comment: Spain, despite its huge population, when size of the country is taken into account emerges as the least densely populated of the 3 countries – so relative densities of population, nor GINI index can account for this huge mortality relative to the others! Early population testing does help in these 2 countries
Problem 2: How is it possible for the Swedish Government’s policy on Covid-19 to be so liberal? (While the Italian population has been under severe lockdown, in Sweden at present the population is still able to shop, to go to restaurants, to get haircuts and to send children to school).
Sweden Italy
Cases /million (today, 6th april) 37 2,244
How many days to double prevalence? 8 days 16 days
Size of population 10.2M 60.4M
Area of country 450,295km2 301,338 km2
Density of populations/km2 22.65 200,4
GINI Index 28.8 35.9
Comment: The Swedes have a small population spread over a huge area; they are a long way from stabilization to their final case rate; Italy has a population density much higher than Sweden. The doubling time is much less for Sweden, indicating that there is still much to be done before stabilization, while Italy is further along its curve. This gives the Swedish government extra time. Any sensible government will delay the time they restrict their population.
(The inequality between the rich and the poor is much less in Sweden than in Italy. Wait and see: but I suspect that by the stabilization at the end, Sweden will still have fewer cases than Italy, perhaps related to its lower GINI index).
David Goldberg
Sunday 19 April
35 days survived, 56 days to go
Comments
Post a Comment